Capacitors...debunking the shame of vintage crossovers

I’m in the capacitor upgrade camp. First speaker I really upgraded was a pair of AR5’s. They sounded sooo much better with modern caps. Amps, too. Fishers, Dynacos…got to get good caps in them. I do like certain old, tubular caps in guitar tone circuits. It’s like the worse they sound as couplers, the better they sound in a guitar. For my Altecs, I haven’t really finalized the cap. I’ve got a big clump of poly types, 2 uf, 5 uf, a couple 1 uf’s, to get the value I wanted. But, I haven’t decided on the final cap. Was going to go PIO.

Maybe I need the MCap Supreme….hmm
 
I have a local dealer who is trying to assemble the parts for a crossover for my speakers. It is taking a fairly long time finding the paper in oil Western Electric caps he wants to use for the crossover. The midrange driver in my system-- Western Electric 713b--presents a bit of a problem because of its low impedance compared to the rest of the system such that high value or parallel caps will be needed. I don't know about crossover design so I am leaving this up to him, but, the caps he wants are quite expensive. The other problem is that even if the caps are within specification for capacitance and leakage, it is hard to find ones with low ESR and a number of caps have been acquired and rejected for this project.

I recently heard a speaker being built in this store where some vintage paper in oil caps were originally used for the build but they have been replaced with new Audio Note copper foil caps. The speaker sounds "drier" and cleaner than with the vintage paper in oils, but, I sort of like the sound. The dealer said that the caps were quite good for "cheap" caps (only about $1,000 each). I might inquire about the silver foil versions.
 
I have a local dealer who is trying to assemble the parts for a crossover for my speakers. It is taking a fairly long time finding the paper in oil Western Electric caps he wants to use for the crossover. The midrange driver in my system-- Western Electric 713b--presents a bit of a problem because of its low impedance compared to the rest of the system such that high value or parallel caps will be needed. I don't know about crossover design so I am leaving this up to him, but, the caps he wants are quite expensive. The other problem is that even if the caps are within specification for capacitance and leakage, it is hard to find ones with low ESR and a number of caps have been acquired and rejected for this project.

I recently heard a speaker being built in this store where some vintage paper in oil caps were originally used for the build but they have been replaced with new Audio Note copper foil caps. The speaker sounds "drier" and cleaner than with the vintage paper in oils, but, I sort of like the sound. The dealer said that the caps were quite good for "cheap" caps (only about $1,000 each). I might inquire about the silver foil versions.
That makes sense. I was just discussing this with a customer setting up a 713B/728 combo. Yeah, the "Feeling of Prescence" era Western Electric components... ie the WE755,WE728, the 713 drivers (most of them) etc were all very low nominal impedance for the era -- back then the norm of course was 16ohm for most all drivers, then 8ohm by the early/mid 60s. Other than WE and a few RCA other odds & ends, we didn't see low impedance in HiFi until the later Solid State, "wattage wars" era.

But it's no big deal.... just run the calculator and you can see the values of the chokes and capacitors simply change for the low impedance coils. For the bigger or lower uF figures, you can certainly find these values surplus online pretty quickly. In reality anything approximately close usually works pretty well. But when you go shopping for some of the fancy "Fru-Fru" audiophile caps -- strange values I've noticed are scarce or really expensive.

Last time I chatted with Joe, he had an interesting working theory, or perhaps just an observation that WECO had a nice ecosystem going with the lovely 171C OPT (arguably the best sounding, and most flexible in the world, really) -- and it has a nice 4 ohm tap perfect for the full range speakers.
By the time everything was plumbed into the crossover of the WE757 system – – I think the system was strapped for to present a 16 ohm load – – but will have to go back and look at that.
The other hi-fi era WE systems – – like the 753 came in a variety of impedances. But everything was wired up a little bit differently back then. The special KS version of the Jensen A15PM woofer, was 16ohm (reads around 11ish DCR as I recall)

Keep in mind, ESR is a test made in the non-audio domain (usually 100khz where the mosquitos listen?) , and "leakage" is a test for HV DC applications, not LowVolt AC like music.
Most types of "Leaky" caps subjected to HV 200~600V DC (aka 0 hz) will slowly reform, but some only to a point. How all this might apply to a LV audio signal (10 - 30 volts ish AC) is very much in the air, but to some extent is observable on a Freqency-Impedance sweep test. You guys might want to check those rejected caps that way -- results likely won't be what you expect. Will they sound good? Some will, and some won't -- depends on type and brand as per previous discussions, I guess.

Any rate, crossover circuitry is absolutely nothing special...do go there, and don't stay in the dark....get involved in your design (use a simple 1st order or 2nd order circuit and play from there) , and do some experimenting. Alligator clips will be your best friend and best teacher. You'll find what you like very quickly.

To that end, I think $1000/ea for any capacitor is too much...... I hate to say that – – because I do also sell very expensive capacitors, just nothing close to that..
I can't think of any that would be worth paying more than a a few hundred/each (max!)) for (at this time). That even covers the rarest of the Western Electric paper oil capacitors in perfect operating condition that are on top of the sound, also collectible. There are a few other capacitors that have specific uses and very rare cinema equipment that get a little bit expensive as well – – but I know what you were talking about.

It's those very expensive foil capacitors made out of various types of plastic and high-tech dielectrics and maybe some silver and other nice materials. I have a friend who got all into the Black Gates and did like the sound I know that they probably do deliver a bit for the money – – but nothing close to what they cost. There's absolutely got to be an alternative for 1/10 of the price at least that is my guess.

Even if you were looking for the sweet and dry – – Or clean and dry I've heard that description a lot of extremely high-end capacitors.
Actually, when you hook them up to test equipment you can kind of see that kind of result... They are fast, they don't leak, and they have a sharp cut off with a very clean looking curve . I think that can help out some systems or at least at least give a initial impression of a very clean and hi-fi sound.
The downside to this I think, might be a bit of notch out in frequencies – – because the capacitor is performing in such a strict manner. That might be what you're hearing. The clean and dry sound can be very alluring at first – – and also possibly lend itself to a very tight circuit --- don't spend big bucks on that discipline – – and also don't fall for that type of tonality until you have lived with it for a while... that can get your ears tired quickly, along with the feeling, you're missing some of the music (esp elements in the midrange).

And on the oil capacitors, you'll definitely have your work cut out for you if you want to listen to all the different kinds available. They all sound a little bit different. Friends and customers have told me that they often don't care for the kind of rough quality motor starting capacitors (YMMV, there are many different ones) – – but those tend to be the modern oil capacitors with different dielectric materials. When we're talking old paper and oil, are usually talking about the stuff from the 1940s or 50s – – companies like Aerovox, CDE, Sprague, and TOBE all made nice ones for the Military / Aerospace, you can still get really cheaply. Western Electric ones do sound better. And they aren't super expensive -- they come in very low values, with great voltage ratings. If you need more uF you can just strap them together..

My friends that like to make really bulletproof stuff – – scour eBay for military and aerospace surplus – – there are so many different types of exotic materials you can get for peanuts – – often brand new – – originally made with no price point (aka for the military/gov't). This also includes bi-polar tantalum caps which can be found in values very appropriate for your crossover.

While I do have a lots of customers that adore the oil capacitors – – me and friends kind of prefer the electrolytic type (functional ones, tht is)– – and I've also really had great luck with paper wax capacitors (aka WE437/439 or 137/139's) – that's what WECO used with your 713 (usually) – I think they sound more neutral with fewer colorations compared to any of the other types (nevermind the higher ESR). Me, other sellers or eBay -- those won't run you more than $50~100 /ea and sometimes way less AS-IS. Try to buy them tested unless you don't mind the gamble... or if you don't care. I just sold a pair of prewar 139 (2uf) for $200 tested ... Some would consider that a fairly high price. I think they are still on the rise – – and you can definitely get them for less if you shop around.
Even the leaky ones if they aren't too far gone are still playing well for many.

Still testing that bold statement – – and apologies for that test session I was going to have... Got my Solens lined up – – and my drifted / and not drifted or leaky Western Electric's lined up – – and will be getting them together on the bench hopefully soon.

That's why I wanted to get to some testing. Whether or not you like the tone of one capacitor or another – – that is definitely a thing as well.

Personally, I like components that screw around with the sound as little as possible (tweaks like that are, in effect, a form if analog EQ ...if you are say, rolling tubes, wire or caps to fix or alter). A neutral / natural sound is, itself quite revealing (and least fatiguing). These components are around, but you sure do need to hunt for them. Read what others say, and perhaps avoid the parts that have a collective reputation for brightness/harshness (as I find that can be the toughest thing to work out of a setup) (by the time the "harshness is out of the brite, it then sounds dull, etc, etc).

Sealed/ported/and many Reflex systems of the mid 60s~70s sounded way too dull / dark from the factory.... One theory as to why that may have been – – many silicon solid-state amps back then were super harsh. Mellow speakers sounded much better with them. By the late 70s mfr's caught on...they made adjustments and more-so when in the 1980s MOSFETs began to rule the roost...some got downright milky and dark! Bright speakers came back because then they sounded better with the mellow amps. Sort of like just industry adjustments/fads in reaction to changes in electronics we think. Nowadays when you fire up those old speaker systems from any number of the classic companies, and run them with a nice tube amp.... they sound too mushy... "Upgrading" the capacitors is sort of like tweaking the brilliance control and can definitely make those set ups sound "cleaner" and more precise....that's one theory, anyway.

Surprisingly that's what a lot of the old world materials frequently provide....neutrality
 
Last edited:
hifitown,

Thank you for your very informative post. It sounds like you have a lot of experience with this kind of vintage gear. My local dealer, who puts together custom-built systems with mostly vintage drivers has a newly built system running WE 713A/32 horn midrange, 18" Goodman woofers, and currently manufactured Fostex tweeter. This is a really nice sounding system. He originally had a crossover that used, I believe, Sprague paper in oil caps, but, given the sonic taste of a particular potential customer, he changed out the caps for some modern Audio Note caps. This system is VERY dynamic, punchy, and has a lot of weight to the sound. I like the clarity of the Audio Note caps, but, it is taking quite a long time for the sound to stabilize.

What is particularly interesting to me is that the 713A driver and the Goodman woofers cost a small fortune, but the tweeters are very cheap. The builder chose the tweeters entirely by what he hears and the fact that he only requires the tweeter to play at the very top of its range. While I am not in the market for new speakers, I do lust after the Goodman woofers--this dealer has both 18" permanent magnet and field coil versions and they are my favorite woofers. The other drivers this dealer has, and I've heard in custom systems and I really love is the Jensen M10 field coil driver.
 
Far from someone with definitive conclusions, I will offer up my current (and easily changed) opinions on this subject.

I hate to be the contrarian, but- Not a fan of Sonic Cap anything... They all sound sterile, zippy and white washed to me. Maybe some people like that with the "Altec" designs to dry up the sound a bit.

I'm also not a fan of the high end booster network common with Altecs crossovers. It sounds like to me that it causes phase issues... especially in the mid bass. The simpler the crossover the better the midbass has been my experience.

Different horns benefit from different caps. The 32 just naturally blends so well with direct radiators. This presents a more flexible tweeter cap choice where as a straight horn benefits from some "help" with integration. Straight horns like the big vintage oil caps. I read somewhere on a Western Electric owners thread that the oil cans "slow down" the higher frequencies which helps the coherence with the big and small drivers. Not sure if that is actually true but it describes what I hear.

My current cap of choice for the 32 horn is Mundorf MCap Supreme Aluminum Cap.

Regarding Resisters: I don't like rolling R's due to the rocky burn in period. If anyone likes something better than Mills, I would love to hear about it.







I have to agree about Sonicaps at least in my system. I built Crites B speaker, a sort of Cornwall clone. Gen 1 and although clarity and detail were their strong points they just made the speakers sound too bright, unnaturally so. I ended up with NOS mil spec PIO cans and couldn't be more pleased. A great cap off the audiophiles radar is the CDE 942c series film-foil which I use for output coupling in my tube pre.
I've used their WMF polyester in amp coupling stages to good effect as well as NOS PIO.
I believe generally that speaker designers used network components that best fit the need, cost and design goals for sound. I'm no audio engineer but I trust my ears and over time had fun dialing in to taste each piece of gear and speaker for best system synergy. That being said very few if any of our systems are identical and it's great to have these options for dialing in the sound we personally are looking for. Great post OP.
 
I have to agree about Sonicaps at least in my system. I built Crites B speaker, a sort of Cornwall clone. Gen 1 and although clarity and detail were their strong points they just made the speakers sound too bright, unnaturally so. I ended up with NOS mil spec PIO cans and couldn't be more pleased. A great cap off the audiophiles radar is the CDE 942c series film-foil which I use for output coupling in my tube pre.
I've used their WMF polyester in amp coupling stages to good effect as well as NOS PIO.
I believe generally that speaker designers used network components that best fit the need, cost and design goals for sound. I'm no audio engineer but I trust my ears and over time had fun dialing in to taste each piece of gear and speaker for best system synergy. That being said very few if any of our systems are identical and it's great to have these options for dialing in the sound we personally are looking for. Great post OP.

The 942's and 940's are fantastic caps, I _think_ the higher voltage rated ones sound better, but that could also be my ears validating my emptier wallet.

Another off radar film cap is the Panasonic EZP-E caps, good when you need higher capacitance. I like them in crossovers, filter caps for amps, etc. They have kelvin connections, and are similar to the Wima DC link caps.

Cheers,
Gable
 
Customers come into my shop asking about a re-capping thier amp/pre-amp/receiver/console & speakers. I perform a diagnostic on their equipment and find nothing wrong with it other than a dirty ballance or volume pot. I call the customer to get approval for this simple repair. After we talk numbers, they ask me to recap it anyways. At which point I will always discourage fixing things that are not broken. However they insist because that's what they have read on the internet & 4000 bloggers say otherwise... Face palm, eye roll..etc at this point.

So I give them a new estimate which is significantly more and they pay it. 30% of the time I will get a call from the customer about 2 weeks later. They tell me they are unhappy with the "new" sound of their equipment and want me to reinstall all the old caps into thier equipment. I give them the estimate & once again they pay to replace all the new caps with the originals.
 
The 942's and 940's are fantastic caps, I _think_ the higher voltage rated ones sound better, but that could also be my ears validating my emptier wallet.

Another off radar film cap is the Panasonic EZP-E caps, good when you need higher capacitance. I like them in crossovers, filter caps for amps, etc. They have kelvin connections, and are similar to the Wima DC link caps.

Cheers,
Gable
I have 942c's for output coupling in my tube pre,
1uf 1kv they're quite large. I certainly don't need the higher voltage but it's what Mouser had at the time and tube guru John Broskie has been recommending them. Considerably less expensive than any boutique cap in the same capacitance value and with no BS brands like Cornell Dubilier you can actually see a data sheet. I trust data from proven manufactures but I'm very skeptical of sales hype with claims that can't be substantiated from 250.00 an ounce boutique brands.
 
Customers come into my shop asking about a re-capping thier amp/pre-amp/receiver/console & speakers. I perform a diagnostic on their equipment and find nothing wrong with it other than a dirty ballance or volume pot. I call the customer to get approval for this simple repair. After we talk numbers, they ask me to recap it anyways. At which point I will always discourage fixing things that are not broken. However they insist because that's what they have read on the internet & 4000 bloggers say otherwise... Face palm, eye roll..etc at this point.

So I give them a new estimate which is significantly more and they pay it. 30% of the time I will get a call from the customer about 2 weeks later. They tell me they are unhappy with the "new" sound of their equipment and want me to reinstall all the old caps into thier equipment. I give them the estimate & once again they pay to replace all the new caps with the original
Haha, yeah I did not want to reference DC coupling and or power supply caps --- that's were the stigma really hits home....

But now that we are going there – – I've heard similar stories to this a lot. Nothing beats hours on the bench to see what really goes wrong with stuff. I must say that in the past 10 or 20 years – – even I have become skeptical of preserving really old capacitors that see hours of high-voltage – – but yeah --- you really have to take it on a case-by-case basis!

Case Study:
A dear old friend, who knows his stuff – – recently got in a some late 1950s/early 60s Pilot amps
One had original Guideman's (or similar) -- and had been cooked for 60 years, (not 20, like the Fru-Fru's) -- they were still serviceable...after some love from the VariAc...

The other had been "upgraded" or recapped in the 1990's with "Fru-Fru" Audiophile caps.... and I quote their state as per his report::

""Ultratone silver foils at $23 a pop back in the 90’s. Reading 5-10VDC on the grids of the output tubes.
Rated for 650V circuit in one specified for 400V""
!!1667883370847.png
 
Last edited:
At the risk of betraying Hifitown’s appreciated discretion, there are a few points that may add to this debate. First off, I made an error in my report to Hifitown; the caps were $13 each in the 90’s and not $23 as I inadvertently sent in my text to him.

In brief: I worked on 2 Pilot SA-232 in a period of 2-3 weeks. 232’s run extremely hot and (figuratively) cook their components. No coupling caps in the first amp, nor previous 232’s (I’ve worked on over a half dozen over the years), have displayed leakage at the grids of the output tubes. In the second amp, the output coupling caps labeled “Ultratone Laser Etched Silver Alloy Foil in Paper” and “Super Performance Music Conductor” were leaky to the point of allowing 5-10V on the EL-84 grids. Interestingly, the original .047 interstage coupling caps (Gudeman) in the amp were tested and found to be fine.

My editorial: In our world of coaxing electrons to orbit the way we want them to, I’ll take the might of the electronics industry over the desired outcome of dreamers. I’ll take the R&D departments of Sprague, Mallory and others over the dreams of audiophile marketers. I’m sure neither VTV nor the manufacturer intended to put out an inferior product. I’m sure the owner of the Black Dahlia website meant to get around to extended use tests before declaring Ultratone caps to be “the most amazing coupling caps I have ever auditioned.” But in the long run, my guess is that if the products put out by boutique companies performed as well as those of the entrenched giants, they would now be big companies too. Take a look at The Boston Beer Co.
 
You should always choose capacitors based on how they sound in your application. I have actually been able to hear some the tweaky expensive film caps "talk" when in operation. The old oil bath cap design is very stable and long lasting. But you need to be careful with these. Some of the pre 1970 oil caps used PCB's as their choice of oil. They can be dangerous if they encounter a short that causes them to pop. PCB fires are NOT a good thing!
 
Does anyone know if these capacitors are worth giving a go? The 1uf and 0.1uf values could be used in a preamp I have (the voltage is fine), it looks though that the case is used as one of the conections which I’ve never come across before.

FE5DD7F8-EF7B-4799-ADAF-06AF44F419AD.jpeg

at the risk of going off topic, I’d be interested in hearing if there are any vintage Resistors worth seeking out?
 
Does anyone know if these capacitors are worth giving a go? The 1uf and 0.1uf values could be used in a preamp I have (the voltage is fine), it looks though that the case is used as one of the conections which I’ve never come across before.

View attachment 56291

at the risk of going off topic, I’d be interested in hearing if there are any vintage Resistors worth seeking out?
Those old Vitamin Q paper in oil caps are highly sought after by guitarists for their tonal qualities.
If they're not leaking DC when in circuit I wouldn't hesitate to use them. As far as resistors go you're better off new to ensure tight tolerances. In my tube gear I really like the Takman carbon films.
 
Customers come into my shop asking about a re-capping thier amp/pre-amp/receiver/console & speakers. I perform a diagnostic on their equipment and find nothing wrong with it other than a dirty ballance or volume pot. I call the customer to get approval for this simple repair. After we talk numbers, they ask me to recap it anyways. At which point I will always discourage fixing things that are not broken. However they insist because that's what they have read on the internet & 4000 bloggers say otherwise... Face palm, eye roll..etc at this point.

So I give them a new estimate which is significantly more and they pay it. 30% of the time I will get a call from the customer about 2 weeks later. They tell me they are unhappy with the "new" sound of their equipment and want me to reinstall all the old caps into thier equipment. I give them the estimate & once again they pay to replace all the new caps with the originals.
One thing I think you are missing, is that for a lot of folks running old gear, the desire to recap is as much for reliability, as it is for sound. I , and many friends, have had to deal with issues with Caps popping in serviced gear that checked out fine when it was in the hands of the tech, but then failed two weeks later. Back to the tech, gets serviced (ie failed caps replaced) back into the rotation again, and a month later another cap fails. I’ve had this happen more times than I want to describe. @MikeO can certainly speak to this frustration too. The gear I have had fully recapped by quality techs, has almost without fail, just kept working after the recap is done. Usually the only long term pain point is noisy switches/pots.
 
That makes sense. I was just discussing this with a customer setting up a 713B/728 combo. Yeah, the "Feeling of Prescence" era Western Electric components... ie the WE755,WE728, the 713 drivers (most of them) etc were all very low nominal impedance for the era -- back then the norm of course was 16ohm for most all drivers, then 8ohm by the early/mid 60s. Other than WE and a few RCA other odds & ends, we didn't see low impedance in HiFi until the later Solid State, "wattage wars" era.

But it's no big deal.... just run the calculator and you can see the values of the chokes and capacitors simply change for the low impedance coils. For the bigger or lower uF figures, you can certainly find these values surplus online pretty quickly. In reality anything approximately close usually works pretty well. But when you go shopping for some of the fancy "Fru-Fru" audiophile caps -- strange values I've noticed are scarce or really expensive.

Last time I chatted with Joe, he had an interesting working theory, or perhaps just an observation that WECO had a nice ecosystem going with the lovely 171C OPT (arguably the best sounding, and most flexible in the world, really) -- and it has a nice 4 ohm tap perfect for the full range speakers.
By the time everything was plumbed into the crossover of the WE757 system – – I think the system was strapped for to present a 16 ohm load – – but will have to go back and look at that.
The other hi-fi era WE systems – – like the 753 came in a variety of impedances. But everything was wired up a little bit differently back then. The special KS version of the Jensen A15PM woofer, was 16ohm (reads around 11ish DCR as I recall)

Keep in mind, ESR is a test made in the non-audio domain (usually 100khz where the mosquitos listen?) , and "leakage" is a test for HV DC applications, not LowVolt AC like music.
Most types of "Leaky" caps subjected to HV 200~600V DC (aka 0 hz) will slowly reform, but some only to a point. How all this might apply to a LV audio signal (10 - 30 volts ish AC) is very much in the air, but to some extent is observable on a Freqency-Impedance sweep test. You guys might want to check those rejected caps that way -- results likely won't be what you expect. Will they sound good? Some will, and some won't -- depends on type and brand as per previous discussions, I guess.

Any rate, crossover circuitry is absolutely nothing special...do go there, and don't stay in the dark....get involved in your design (use a simple 1st order or 2nd order circuit and play from there) , and do some experimenting. Alligator clips will be your best friend and best teacher. You'll find what you like very quickly.

To that end, I think $1000/ea for any capacitor is too much...... I hate to say that – – because I do also sell very expensive capacitors, just nothing close to that..
I can't think of any that would be worth paying more than a a few hundred/each (max!)) for (at this time). That even covers the rarest of the Western Electric paper oil capacitors in perfect operating condition that are on top of the sound, also collectible. There are a few other capacitors that have specific uses and very rare cinema equipment that get a little bit expensive as well – – but I know what you were talking about.

It's those very expensive foil capacitors made out of various types of plastic and high-tech dielectrics and maybe some silver and other nice materials. I have a friend who got all into the Black Gates and did like the sound I know that they probably do deliver a bit for the money – – but nothing close to what they cost. There's absolutely got to be an alternative for 1/10 of the price at least that is my guess.

Even if you were looking for the sweet and dry – – Or clean and dry I've heard that description a lot of extremely high-end capacitors.
Actually, when you hook them up to test equipment you can kind of see that kind of result... They are fast, they don't leak, and they have a sharp cut off with a very clean looking curve . I think that can help out some systems or at least at least give a initial impression of a very clean and hi-fi sound.
The downside to this I think, might be a bit of notch out in frequencies – – because the capacitor is performing in such a strict manner. That might be what you're hearing. The clean and dry sound can be very alluring at first – – and also possibly lend itself to a very tight circuit --- don't spend big bucks on that discipline – – and also don't fall for that type of tonality until you have lived with it for a while... that can get your ears tired quickly, along with the feeling, you're missing some of the music (esp elements in the midrange).

And on the oil capacitors, you'll definitely have your work cut out for you if you want to listen to all the different kinds available. They all sound a little bit different. Friends and customers have told me that they often don't care for the kind of rough quality motor starting capacitors (YMMV, there are many different ones) – – but those tend to be the modern oil capacitors with different dielectric materials. When we're talking old paper and oil, are usually talking about the stuff from the 1940s or 50s – – companies like Aerovox, CDE, Sprague, and TOBE all made nice ones for the Military / Aerospace, you can still get really cheaply. Western Electric ones do sound better. And they aren't super expensive -- they come in very low values, with great voltage ratings. If you need more uF you can just strap them together..

My friends that like to make really bulletproof stuff – – scour eBay for military and aerospace surplus – – there are so many different types of exotic materials you can get for peanuts – – often brand new – – originally made with no price point (aka for the military/gov't). This also includes bi-polar tantalum caps which can be found in values very appropriate for your crossover.

While I do have a lots of customers that adore the oil capacitors – – me and friends kind of prefer the electrolytic type (functional ones, tht is)– – and I've also really had great luck with paper wax capacitors (aka WE437/439 or 137/139's) – that's what WECO used with your 713 (usually) – I think they sound more neutral with fewer colorations compared to any of the other types (nevermind the higher ESR). Me, other sellers or eBay -- those won't run you more than $50~100 /ea and sometimes way less AS-IS. Try to buy them tested unless you don't mind the gamble... or if you don't care. I just sold a pair of prewar 139 (2uf) for $200 tested ... Some would consider that a fairly high price. I think they are still on the rise – – and you can definitely get them for less if you shop around.
Even the leaky ones if they aren't too far gone are still playing well for many.

Still testing that bold statement – – and apologies for that test session I was going to have... Got my Solens lined up – – and my drifted / and not drifted or leaky Western Electric's lined up – – and will be getting them together on the bench hopefully soon.

That's why I wanted to get to some testing. Whether or not you like the tone of one capacitor or another – – that is definitely a thing as well.

Personally, I like components that screw around with the sound as little as possible (tweaks like that are, in effect, a form if analog EQ ...if you are say, rolling tubes, wire or caps to fix or alter). A neutral / natural sound is, itself quite revealing (and least fatiguing). These components are around, but you sure do need to hunt for them. Read what others say, and perhaps avoid the parts that have a collective reputation for brightness/harshness (as I find that can be the toughest thing to work out of a setup) (by the time the "harshness is out of the brite, it then sounds dull, etc, etc).

Sealed/ported/and many Reflex systems of the mid 60s~70s sounded way too dull / dark from the factory.... One theory as to why that may have been – – many silicon solid-state amps back then were super harsh. Mellow speakers sounded much better with them. By the late 70s mfr's caught on...they made adjustments and more-so when in the 1980s MOSFETs began to rule the roost...some got downright milky and dark! Bright speakers came back because then they sounded better with the mellow amps. Sort of like just industry adjustments/fads in reaction to changes in electronics we think. Nowadays when you fire up those old speaker systems from any number of the classic companies, and run them with a nice tube amp.... they sound too mushy... "Upgrading" the capacitors is sort of like tweaking the brilliance control and can definitely make those set ups sound "cleaner" and more precise....that's one theory, anyway.

Surprisingly that's what a lot of the old world materials frequently provide....neutrality
Or at least your perception of what is neutral.
 
At the risk of betraying Hifitown’s appreciated discretion, there are a few points that may add to this debate. First off, I made an error in my report to Hifitown; the caps were $13 each in the 90’s and not $23 as I inadvertently sent in my text to him.

In brief: I worked on 2 Pilot SA-232 in a period of 2-3 weeks. 232’s run extremely hot and (figuratively) cook their components. No coupling caps in the first amp, nor previous 232’s (I’ve worked on over a half dozen over the years), have displayed leakage at the grids of the output tubes. In the second amp, the output coupling caps labeled “Ultratone Laser Etched Silver Alloy Foil in Paper” and “Super Performance Music Conductor” were leaky to the point of allowing 5-10V on the EL-84 grids. Interestingly, the original .047 interstage coupling caps (Gudeman) in the amp were tested and found to be fine.

My editorial: In our world of coaxing electrons to orbit the way we want them to, I’ll take the might of the electronics industry over the desired outcome of dreamers. I’ll take the R&D departments of Sprague, Mallory and others over the dreams of audiophile marketers. I’m sure neither VTV nor the manufacturer intended to put out an inferior product. I’m sure the owner of the Black Dahlia website meant to get around to extended use tests before declaring Ultratone caps to be “the most amazing coupling caps I have ever auditioned.” But in the long run, my guess is that if the products put out by boutique companies performed as well as those of the entrenched giants, they would now be big companies too. Take a look at The Boston Beer

‘I don’t think that is necessarily The case at all. A small volume, “boutique’ if you will, manufacture is not set up to produce a high volume of anything. Scaling any product from a niche market, to high volume is incredibly expensive and ridiculously risky. Much smarter to stay in a lower volume/higher margin then try to challenge a Panasonic or someone in the low margin/high volume world.
 
Last edited:
To recap or not to recap. This is something I've researched ad nauseum as I have a 35-year-old receiver that I still use. Like most debates there is a large, fuzzy, gray area between the 2 extremes. As a consumer I have to weigh the perceived value of having my receiver recapped - especially since everything sounds fine to me. My plan is to have the receiver checked out by a reputable tech (when I find one) to make sure it is operating to specifications. If the tech recommends recapping, I will ask him why and to show me what he is measuring that lead him to that recommendation. Certainly, if a cap decides to let the magic smoke out in my old receiver, I will strongly consider having additional recapping done.
 
For me the decision became evident when the amp was powered up and the plates immediately turned bright red.. It is amazing to me how many times an amp was brought into my shop by a customer whose only complaint that the "amp sounded weird, or it had a weird hum". For some reason many people do not even look at the tubes or understand what they see. As for my choice of coupling caps. I really like the SiderealKaps, Relcaps and Wonder Caps. Back in the 90's prior to Richard's passing, I purchased a large quantity of his Sidereal's to help him out of some tax difficulty he was having at the time. Ironically, I am still using them as a NOS item and I still like them. I also have some (a lot) of Plessey .1uF/600V poly's that I purchased at the Marantz auction that sound very good for interstage coupling.
 
I am not a tech, but it seems over the years I have gleaned that often power supply cap fatigue/failure can be a source/cause of other caps failing. This would lead me to believe that if a bunch of caps are popping soon after they checked out good there are probably still some other issues that weren't addressed in the original diagnosis. I don't have faith in a lot of techs anymore. Even the supposed expert techs at some of the better audio places misdiagnose stuff. Seems a lot of them think a total recap fixes everything. You take it to them with a specific issue, they replace some caps, then you get the piece back and the original problem is still there. I spent more on my MA6100 than I can sell it for. It went to three different well respected techs in the Portland area and never did get fixed correctly. I was just about to send it to Terry D when I found out he was going to retire and not taking any more business. Now it works, but not right, so it is sitting under my bed not being used as I have other money pits to finance that yield better returns.

Sorry for the rant, just meant to say I'd rather be listening to my amp than worrying about what brand of caps they used.
 
You should always choose capacitors based on how they sound in your application. I have actually been able to hear some the tweaky expensive film caps "talk" when in operation. The old oil bath cap design is very stable and long lasting. But you need to be careful with these. Some of the pre 1970 oil caps used PCB's as their choice of oil. They can be dangerous if they encounter a short that causes them to pop. PCB fires are NOT a good thing!
Regarding audio crossover uses... that's a great term! .. "talking"... yes that is very descriptive. The speedy film caps seem to be especially bad about this. I have noticed a few instances that totally failed, malfunctioning caps (truly...beyond-leaky-bad) -- can distort -- that sounds similar, but different. The Solen's from Parts Express do talk, a small amount. I think (though yet unconfirmed) that this has to do with Slew Rate.

PCB oils are mineral oil with PCB's added to enhance dielectric effects (AFIK). They got a bad rap 1970s onward from horrific, large in scale, environmental spills perpetrated by the Military-Industrial complex.
For audio crossover, and also smaller power supplies, they rarely, if ever fail. Handling them is pretty safe. If you ever get some ooze on you, just wash it off. They certainly are not good to soak in for extended periods of time...but the cancer causing effects are not much off burnt motor oil (depending on who you listen to).
I would expect regular mineral oil to suffice, but talking HV applications, the PCB's do aid in voltage ratings and longevity. The old caps are always hermetically sealed anyway..I like the glass seals best (like the old Vit Q's)
As far as fires... yikes! That must have been some heavy duty industrial stuff (not audio?)... like old sub-stations or huge transmitters perhaps? That type applicaiton would be dangerous for any oil filled / fueled fire I suppose.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top