Jim Lansing H-1000 horns- American Instruments

The A808 was designed with similarly fast and short expansion geometry. Which is technically better? No direct comparison is possible: Cast aluminum versus sheet steel. Different drivers....
If @widerangesound is who I think he is*, he can compare Lansing H808 sheet steel, tar filled horns directly to original JBL H-1000 horns because he has both. His H808's are early Lansing with 3-hole mounts, so he can use the same JBL drivers on both types of horns. Not the same as comparing a modern manufacture cast horn obviously, but I'd be interested to hear his impressions of H808 vs H1000.

* (SA--is that you? Long time!)
 
Last edited:
If @widerangesound is who I think he is*, he can compare Lansing H808 sheet steel, tar filled horns directly to original JBL H-1000 horns because he has both. His H808's are early Lansing with 3-hole mounts, so he can use the same JBL drivers on both types of horns. Not the same as comparing a modern manufacture cast horn obviously, but I'd be interested to hear his impressions of H808 vs H1000.

* (SA--is that you? Long time!)
It’s nice to have you weigh in to this conversation with your deep experience and expertise. Despite a career selling fine wine, I’ve never been much for using metaphors when judging things for my own tastes. I tend to use a simple, 5 level comparison whether it’s wine or audio gear. Everything fits neatly into my mind as either outstanding, pretty good, acceptable, not very good and awful. I append verbiage as needed to add color - Gawd awful, for example - but those 5 categories serve me well. I no longer own any Lansing or Altec-Lansing H-808 although I have owned pairs of both in the last decade. If the deepest crevices of my brain were analyzed, perhaps there might be found some nuances I discerned listening to each of them. But I tend to not make direct comparisons between items. I’ll never suggest that my way is a better way; it’s just my way. All 3 horns - Lansing, ALCo or Jim Lansing are outstanding horns. The differences are minuscule between the 3 horns. I feel extremely fortunate to have experienced all 3. That I’ve only sold H-1000 as cleaner examples arrived reveals my preference.
 
If @widerangesound is who I think he is*, he can compare Lansing H808 sheet steel, tar filled horns directly to original JBL H-1000 horns because he has both. His H808's are early Lansing with 3-hole mounts, so he can use the same JBL drivers on both types of horns. Not the same as comparing a modern manufacture cast horn obviously, but I'd be interested to hear his impressions of H808 vs H1000.

* (SA--is that you? Long time!)
Ha - he got the same question offline from me! There aren’t too many people running around with pairs of H1000s…
 
I think Widerangesound (and Lycan before) make a great point on this. It’s very much a listening game to see what best suits. I will note a few things…

1. It’s been said by myself and also a distinguished 40-year Lansing/WE collector I know (who has heard more expensive stuff than me): “For its size, the H1000 is unrivaled.” This is a big deal for various factors—WAF and other size constraints. (The H1000, with the baffle, is only 12” wide, 7” high, and 7.5” deep.) But you still want to achieve that "Lansing Iconic" school of sound.

It’s made for that job (a home speaker with cinema roots), and it’s significantly smaller than other vintage peers. While its natural frequency contour is probably faster than most all larger horns—like the 808 (or any number of larger KS types)—it is indeed a conservative 1000Hz horn. In my tests (I will be doing more with time) , it’s actually capable and clear enough down to maybe even 800Hz when paired with certain drivers (B&C plays well). While in its natural state, it’s not as dark or overtly warm. Importantly avoids any sort of “maritime quality” and is less “muffled” in the upper midrange than many slightly larger horns can be.

2. For this reason, the H1000 should be paired with a nice 15” woofer that has good extension into the lower mids. I am only experimenting with 12” woofers for now, and I’m curious about field coil options like the Jensen A-12 at the moment.

3. I come from a primarily all-vintage, at-all-costs background, which is not at all common for builders today (I am in-fact not at all comfortable with the fact that I like the B&C after break-in -- just that one model -- folks.. don't generalize). I do actively have shootouts (plenty of vintage drivers do beat the B&C DE250, but it's not cheap or easy).

Recently, a Haven member visited for some business and trades, and in a rare occurrence, I had a few things set up. We had an impromptu shootout with some SE300B's and other amps. The contender was a really old pair of Lansing/Magnavox Iconic rebuilds in original cabs. These feature the original Lansing H808 horn, three bolt pattern (circa late 30's from Mckinley Ave) with our favorite JBL LE175 driver on the Altec/Lansing 612 cabinet (the small one) and a really good-sounding Jensen 15”. This old wax-finished Iconic cabinet was crossed over with an N800 (I think?), so at 800Hz (crossover seen in the rear).

In the foreground, we had a circa 1950 Jensen Model M (my favorite bass reflex cabinet), loaded with a super cheap Magnavox 232 15” wrapped paper cone (from a console) and the H1000 with the modern B&C DE250 16-ohm driver. This is a test-bed system, and I experiment with all sorts of crossover arrangements. In this shootout, I used a simple first-order cap on the H1000 and nothing on the woofer .. (running it full range).

The Iconic rebuild system, with the 1960s JBL driver and 1930s Lansing 808 horn, has long been a fan favorite. I informed the visitor that I seriously doubted the H1000 would keep up, especially since the Iconic was also a 15” (albiet) in a smaller LF box. Both setups had good, cheap, all-paper 15” woofers, and both were bass reflex. I have no doubts that my lovely solid wood Jensen Model M cabinet is a better LF than the Lansing 612... but the Iconic had a better woofer, and a much better driver, the larger horn and a "real" 12db crossover (a loaded comment as I like 6db anyhoo)

I think it was a fair-ish fight.
Both were good... but we kept coming back to the clear-er HF of the American Instruments version H1000 + the rich-er acoustic bass of the Model M.

I am eager and upfront to say.. if you can get a tar-filled Lansing, WP KS horns, or any of the known good horns (bigger stuff) or original Jim Lansing H1000's for a good price .. go for it.
Results generally don't disappoint in the critical vocal presence regions.

The horn in the shootout photo is a proto unit with no tag and lite finish. Refer to some sample links on shippped finished units as they look different...
https://www.hifitown.com/pictures/americaninstrumentsh1000horn9_10a.jpg
https://www.hifitown.com/pictures/americaninstrumentsh1000horn9_10c.jpg
https://www.hifitown.com/pictures/americaninstrumentsh1000horn15_16a.jpg
https://www.hifitown.com/pictures/americaninstrumentsh1000horn15_16c.jpg
https://www.hifitown.com/pictures/americaninstrumentsh1000horn5_6b.jpg
 

Attachments

  • lansingvsiconic_shootout.webp
    lansingvsiconic_shootout.webp
    382.7 KB · Views: 53
This is my first post here. I have a set of these ordered from Early and hope to have them soon. I have loaded some Karlson K-12 cabinets with Dayton DS 315 8 ohm woofers and am currently driving them with a high current CJ amp. While I am waiting for Early’s horns, I ordered a set of the Brazilian 3D printed M811 multicells and have them mated with the B&C DE 250 16 ohm CD’s driven with SE EL-84’s. Biamped and crossed over at 1.4K with LF boosted and HF slightly attenuated, I have pretty balanced sound with surprisingly extended bass. So, maybe an exception to the 15” woofer requirement.

I did have to clean up the horn throat - here is a pic

1731711180500.webp

I can only imagine the turbulence created by all the squiggly filaments where the printer turned the corner. I still have more smoothing to do but it’s sounding pretty nice right now.

1731711461923.webp
This should keep me happy until I get my H1000’s from Early.

Jack
 
This is my first post here. I have a set of these ordered from Early and hope to have them soon. I have loaded some Karlson K-12 cabinets with Dayton DS 315 8 ohm woofers and am currently driving them with a high current CJ amp. While I am waiting for Early’s horns, I ordered a set of the Brazilian 3D printed M811 multicells and have them mated with the B&C DE 250 16 ohm CD’s driven with SE EL-84’s. Biamped and crossed over at 1.4K with LF boosted and HF slightly attenuated, I have pretty balanced sound with surprisingly extended bass. So, maybe an exception to the 15” woofer requirement.

I did have to clean up the horn throat - here is a pic

View attachment 88237

I can only imagine the turbulence created by all the squiggly filaments where the printer turned the corner. I still have more smoothing to do but it’s sounding pretty nice right now.

View attachment 88239
This should keep me happy until I get my H1000’s from Early.

Jack
IMG_3136.webp

The K12’s will have some competition when the H1000’s get here. Just sayin’
 
Early,

Please give examples. You say plenty of of vintage drivers beat the B&C DE250 but, you don’t say which…
Sorry for the long delay -- this is not a megathrough or super worthy response to your great question.. but it's a start:

Like many modern one-inch compression drivers, the B&C DE250 trades low-end response for a steeper cutoff in its operable regions, typically above 900 Hz, while extending as high as possible -- allowing huge wattage rating for continuous programs. That said, I personally run a modified (mversion of the DE250 with a special rear cap that allows it to go about 100 Hz lower with probably only 1/4 the power handling.. (to make it smoother and more vintage like) . I plan at some point to sell that part.. but the assembly is tricky.
On brand new / stock units... It’s also worth noting that the DE250 has a fairly short but vicious break-in period as well. Once it has settled down, however, it is quite smooth—possibly the smoothest sounding modern one-inch driver I’ve encountered in the past 15-20 years. Coupled with its low cost, availability, and 16-ohm impedance, the DE250 is probably the best contender I’ve seen for replacing vintage drivers in a long time. (DE250 *only* fancier models not recommended)
In contrast, a typical vintage hi-fi driver often has a much lower cutoff, well under 500 Hz in free air resonance, allowing it to play into the lower regions. In practical use with a crossover, this difference might not seem critical, but the tonal characteristics are vastly different—and this is, of course, a big deal. Comparing a really old flexible, large aluminum diaphragm driver to the DE250, you’d hear significantly more musical information playing full-range without a crossover (which, admittedly, nobody does).

Now, on to the list (in no particular order):

1940s Altec 802 B or C (16~20ohm) (by a good ways better than the newer ones)

The Altec 802 from the 1940s, or slightly newer versions from the 1950s and early 1960s, are excellent. However, anything beyond the 802C with the green paint finish is hit or miss, as Altec progressively detuned the diaphragm to prioritize power handling over speed and detail. By the 1970s, sound quality had become average. Variations exist across designs, models, and impedances, with Altec continuing to produce 16-ohm voice coils likely into the 1980s... it's confusion.

The Altec 806 green body also deserves mention -- as realistically all of the drivers in this list are going to be overpowering and require some amount of attenuation. Doing something clever like utilizing one of Altec's slightly less efficient drivers (so long as it has a good diaphragm and it will work fine. )The 806, 804 I believe and many other variants are all going to have the same machining on the face plug. So as long as you don't have any funny business going on under that rear cover – – you can use the smaller magnet drivers to just the same good results.


JBL D175

Walt and I held the odd opinion .. that the black wrinkle finish JBL D175 is standout .. it's later from the 60s and 70s and usually 8 ohm...

Our friend and expert... superuser hobbyist of Lansing/early JBL , @widerangesound prefers the smooth gray drivers from the 1940s and early 1950s (who could sanely disagree?, they are beautiful) . Performance-wise, all these JBLs and Altecs are comparable, capable of dropping down to around 400 Hz Fs (on bench, no load) smoothly and without terrible harshness ( if running the old diaphragms and low power 16 ~24 ohm voice coils)


Stevens Trusonic and ElectroVoice

Stevens Trusonic drivers, made with duraluminum diaphragms, are very interesting but they have a primitive phase plug design, and some models are very good as they have super nice duraluminum spun diaphragms.

Likewise early Electro-Voice drivers are also duraluminum, spun, but later models, mid 50s: onward , used phenolic diaphragms.
EV made some very, very good
sounding drivers ... and are among the better phenolic drivers, *depending on their condition.*


4. Atlas and University Drivers (threaded)


Atlas and University drivers are worth exploring if they have survived their lives wherever they’ve been reclaimed from. A lot of times, these were used in 1950s hi-fi systems, in which case they’ve been babied. However, units pulled from ballparks or other harsh environments might not be functioning as well.


5. Western Electric and IPC


Western Electric drivers, especially the very rare permanent magnet versions like those from IPC, are exceptional. Going further back into the 1920s and 1930s, you’ll find interesting cinema drivers made by companies like BUD (likely manufactured by Ballantyne) and other rebranded designs.

There are also European options, though several brands elude me at the moment. Jensen, for instance, made a line of one-inch drivers with threaded mounts, though I’m not sure if I’m constrained here to two- and three-bolt patterns.

Vintage drivers are amazing if they’re still functioning correctly and original. For reliable, high-fidelity performance with a lower cutoff point, a well-functioning Altec 802 is probably the best choice. JBLs also hold their own, giving you plenty of competition.

The B&C DE 250 actually suffers (minor) a degree the same problem as all these other vintage drivers -- I've measured six of them so far and they all test a bit differently!
Even I'm surprised that modern machining equipment and their fixed design .. does not have tolerance that Western Electric 555's had back in the 30s! Then again Western Electric wasn't working as cheap as B&C ($120 .. so cheap) so the inconsistencies are minor and are fine to live with!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top