Next thing you tell me is that they don't need to track me with the chip in my vaccine because they can track my phone.they dont need to inject a chip into our brains to figure out our thoughts - they can just monitor what we type.
Next thing you tell me is that they don't need to track me with the chip in my vaccine because they can track my phone.they dont need to inject a chip into our brains to figure out our thoughts - they can just monitor what we type.
the price of having access to a lot of information is allowing access to a lot of information, right?Next thing you tell me is that they don't need to track me with the chip in my vaccine because they can track my phone.
I'd hate to be the person whose job it is to digitally spy on me. "Oh lord he's playing angry birds again at 4am, doesn't he know there's 10 years worth of newer apps?"the price of having access to a lot of information is allowing access to a lot of information, right?
Yeah man, like Candy Crush Saga, get with the times!I'd hate to be the person whose job it is to digitally spy on me. "Oh lord he's playing angry birds again at 4am, doesn't he know there's 10 years worth of newer apps?"
Now more evidence that this is a real thing, as reported by 9to5Google.And now will Apple be entering the fray?
Lossless
ALAC up to 24-bit/48 kHz
High-Res Lossless
ALAC up to 24-bit/192 kHz
Now more evidence that this is a real thing, as reported by 9to5Google.
Much like those earlier reports that showed evidence in the iOS14.6 beta, there is also now what appears to be clear indication of lossless audio coming to the Apple Music app for Android (which I didn't even know was a thing), in their 3.6.0 beta release.
Unlike the references seen in that iOS14.6 beta, this new information appears to include two additional details, that being lossless available not only for streaming but also for download, and here's the kicker... two different tiers:
I'll believe it when I see it, and sometimes something spotted in the beta never actually sees the light of day. I'm skeptical only because this doesn't match what that iOS beta was showing, but I guess it is possible that Apple will want to control the user experience more rigidly on their own platform, where they've always been rather strict about battery consumption and how they know best what the end-user wants or needs. Maybe they are less control-freakish in that regard with their software running on Android devices?
Other sources are reporting this announcement won't wait for the Apple WWDC 2021 on June 7th as previously thought, and could be as early as this coming Tuesday May 18th in conjunction with another new version of the AirPods, and that this tier of Apple Music might only be made available for certain MFi certified hardware on the iOS platform.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they try to kneecap Spotify on high res. No other big player has tried it, and it’s their one chance. Apple Music isn’t exactly lighting up people’s imagination- use it or lose it.Now more evidence that this is a real thing, as reported by 9to5Google.
Much like those earlier reports that showed evidence in the iOS14.6 beta, there is also now what appears to be clear indication of lossless audio coming to the Apple Music app for Android (which I didn't even know was a thing), in their 3.6.0 beta release.
Unlike the references seen in that iOS14.6 beta, this new information appears to include two additional details, that being lossless available not only for streaming but also for download, and here's the kicker... two different tiers:
I'll believe it when I see it, and sometimes something spotted in the beta never actually sees the light of day. I'm skeptical only because this doesn't match what that iOS beta was showing, but I guess it is possible that Apple will want to control the user experience more rigidly on their own platform, where they've always been rather strict about battery consumption and how they know best what the end-user wants or needs. Maybe they are less control-freakish in that regard with their software running on Android devices?
Other sources are reporting this announcement won't wait for the Apple WWDC 2021 on June 7th as previously thought, and could be as early as this coming Tuesday May 18th in conjunction with another new version of the AirPods, and that this tier of Apple Music might only be made available for certain MFi certified hardware on the iOS platform.
It looks like they just might, though I'm still not understanding all of the indications that this will coincide with a new version of AirPods, which are currently lossy and limited to AAC256.I wouldn’t be surprised if they try to kneecap Spotify on high res. No other big player has tried it, and it’s their one chance. Apple Music isn’t exactly lighting up people’s imagination- use it or lose it.
I hadn’t thought about them using high res to sell products. That sounds like a very Apple thing to do, to declare their products high res ready like they’re the only ones doing it, because nobody else is saying it despite having the same or better capability. Note I say this as an Apple user— I use their products because I find them to work more effortlessly and intuitively. But they really have a knack for selling people something everybody else has been doing, as something new.It looks like they just might, though I'm still not understanding all of the indications that this will coincide with a new version of AirPods, which are currently lossy and limited to AAC256.
Even if a new version were to be "lossless" that would still likely mean at best aptX HD at 24/48, and even that isn't truly lossless, but rather, "perceptually lossless". If so and Apple's aim in part is to sell more AirPods, then there would be no real reason for a hi-res tier, unless of course other new hardware like a revised HomePod, or even MFi licensed 3rd party powered speakers were also imminent. I'd guess those would work not via Bluetooth, but more likely AirPlay2, or maybe both (either).
This rumor also suggests the pricing for Apple Music HiFi lossless will start at the current $9.99/mo. of their lossy service, undercutting Spotify, Qobuz, and TIDAL.
I think a lot pf people would agree, and though Apple will offer hi-res at that price, many (most?) of those same people won't care, not when they've been getting along just fine with MP3 to date.If Spotify is $15 and Apple $10, for the same resolution, I’d stick with Spotify. It’s $5. I paid that for coffee and a donut this morning. Apple has enough of the world and I like my “Daily Mixes just for you”.
I'd like to try a HomePod in a room/setting I'm familiar with, I've never heard one anywhere except inside The Apple Store, which is meaningless.Yes that’s probably Spotify Connect. Which I’m assuming is the little icon I click in the app to change where the sound comes out. It works well.
I read a headline yesterday touting that Apple Lossless was compatible with their HomePod. I wouldn’t risk $5 on a bet that I could differentiate between high res, even 24/192 (which it won’t do) on a HomePod and MP3 quality.
There’s the small thing about it looking exactly like a roll of toilet paper.I'd like to try a HomePod in a room/setting I'm familiar with, I've never heard one anywhere except inside The Apple Store, which is meaningless.
I've been told they are surprisingly good sounding in a smaller room when setup properly, and that a fair amount of engineering and technology went into the design. Apparently no one cared, they were being discounted almost immediately, which is rare for an Apple product.
Fascinating stuff, well worth the time to absorb, much of it what we've been discussing in various threads here for some time now. I was particularly interested in the part about the U.K. potentially treating the record labels and/or the conglomerates they are owned by as oligopolies.not completely on specific topic, but on the general discussion of streaming and artists being paid etc
Music for Nothing
Everyone streams music. Musicians make pennies. Is Spotify to blame?newrepublic.com
Excellent reading. I’ll go back and listen to the rest but - pretty damning. I knew most of that but to see it all spelled out so clearly in one place, it just makes me want to solely listen to used records so the streamers and labels see nothing.not completely on specific topic, but on the general discussion of streaming and artists being paid etc
Music for Nothing
Everyone streams music. Musicians make pennies. Is Spotify to blame?newrepublic.com
If Spotify is $15 and Apple $10, for the same resolution, I’d stick with Spotify. It’s $5. I paid that for coffee and a donut this morning. Apple has enough of the world and I like my “Daily Mixes just for you”.