While I see exactly what you mean, it is my own opinion that the following are simply false:
Q: Is MQA lossless A: Yes
MQA comes in a lossless (FLAC) file from the music label, so you get exactly what the creators intended. Not according to Neil Young, and probably lots of others too.
Inside the file, MQA is very different: the audio data is higher resolution... False.
MQA delivers clearer sound: our encoders remove the audible ‘digital blur’ that builds up in studio production. False, the opposite has been demonstrated, though it may very well be inaudible.
The decoder authenticates the file, to guarantee that nobody changed it... False, you can remove 30% of the music data and the "authentication" light will still be lit.
MQA is more efficient: it puts the full sound into the container without wasting or losing data. False, lossy compression means data is lost, and it is not more efficient than FLAC (see Miska and Benchmark analysis).
Is it better than lossless? Yes... I'm not even sure how to comment on this one except to say the page quoted is titled "Is MQA Lossless?" but this claim goes a step beyond that, it's now better than lossless.
I guess that last one is a prime example of what you are talking about John, they don't say better in what way, they just say better. I still say false.