Very good observations on the pros and cons of loudspeaker crossovers.
After reading many off the AES papers of the years I would like to add a few things.
John K. Hilliard, J. Robert Ashley, Allan Kaminsky and Richard Small did a lot of the ground breaking research into passive and active crossovers.
Otto Zobel was the first to point out the differences between parallel and series crossovers circuits with his work at Bell Labs.
The main argument for active crossovers was the cost back then.
Active crossovers only required caps and resistors
It was less expensive to use separate amps for each driver compared to the cost of large value inductors required for passive crossovers.
Inductors using iron cores caused so many problems unlike their air core more expensive counterparts.
Brian Cheney of VMPS before his death patented many of his active speaker designs.
Brian also stated on Audio Circle somewhere that a properly designed series crossover performed as well as an active crossover.
Bud Fried also came to the same conclusion with his experience using series crossovers.
I am surprised that so many people don't grasp the understanding of the differences between a series vs parallel circuit.
blog0402.htm
Many of those who argue parallel is better have not done enough research.
Francesco Maffioli's AES paper from 2001 really sums up what Fried and Cheney found out by his extensive research without naming either of them.
Maffioli expanded on the works of the others I have previously stated.
Maffioli proved that if the woofer and and tweeter have the same impedance at the crossover frequency with a first order series circuit it becomes a quasi 2nd order crossover.
You got two crossover slopes for both drivers by using just a cap and inductor.
The AES papers are a wealth of knowledge and copyright protected so I can't post them on the forum.