Out of curiosity, thought to play around with my 9849A.
Kept the original XOs and just replaced the 23746 drivers with my 806A 16 ohms (since 23746 and 806-8A are structurally similar, I knew 806A are 16 ohms). With 806As in place it just sounded shouty and unpleasant to my ears at my usual listening level. After 30 mins of listening resumed to 23746 drivers. Is this an expected sound that anyone has experienced?
To me 23746 drivers with original XOs (looks all original to me, haven't deep looked into yet), 414-8B combo just sounds fantastic and I could visualize the band in my room - using 45 SET amp.
Keep it that way and just enjoy the music!
I won't recommend that. I tried using an 802 motor + 34647 and 23744 'fram on top of my Altec 756B. Both sounded shouty. That's why I searched for a smaller 806/807 motor and fitted it with the 23744 'fram = my 23746.Down the path I'm looking to replace 23746 with 802D keeping the original XOs (custom XO design might take a while for me). Would 803D be any better experience than 23746 drivers or shouty/unpleasant?
Thanks
As @Salectric has mentioned before, his reverse engineered 9849 XO schematic was optimized for 8 ohm Altec drivers (414-8B + 23746) in the 9849 box.
IME, the 802D with original 20275 'frams + 32C + 414A work great in my Altec 753C which is a bigger box and all the drivers are nominally 16 ohm.
I've never heard a 9849 but after my experience using the HF XO section on my mini Altec 757 project, if I had a chance to get a pair, I'd keep them stock. At best (or worst), I might build an outboard XO with the same circuit but using PIO caps.