The fit and finish on what photos I could find of the Audio Note AX-twos has dampened my desire for them. As does coming across nonsense like this:
"The pedestrian looks of the Audio Note loudspeakers are well calculated. The front baffle dimensions and depth of the cabinet are an integral part of the wave launch support and controlled defraction characteristics pioneered by Peter Snell in the 1970's. Smaller, narrow baffles, like those found in most of today's "fashion victim" designs currently masquerading as quality loudspeakers achieve nothing other than to compromise midrange frequency and tonal colourations."
I write advertising copy for a living. Good job turning your money-saving into a tribalist have-to-have.
Onward. I think I'll save for the fashion victim P3esrs.
Yeah - I was fortunate to listen to the products before I read Peter Qvortrup's rather strong opinions of audio products - as he was a major importer and retailer for many many brands for decades. One of those brands was Peter Snell's original speakers. I can't really say I disagree with him in the sense that I have yet to hear a narrow baffle slim speaker with multiple woofers that beat the wide baffle AN's or for that matter wide baffles from Trenner and Freidl, Harbeth, Volti, Tannoy etc. These speakers tend to mop the floor with narrow speakers from Totem, Magico, Wilson Benesch, Paradigm, PSB, Polk, B&W etc.
Or at the very least the two schools are different to the extent that I can easily see why those who favour wide baffles view the alternate to be rubbish.
The same thing was echoed by a Boston Acoustics dealer who was at Soundhounds (my dealer in Victoria) who noted that the AN E sounded better than any BA speaker he was representing. I asked him why not have Boston Acoustics make a version of the speaker (as BA owned Snell and thus own the rights to the Snell speakers as well).
His reply was "That look won't sell." Peter Qvortrup was asked by B&W a similar thing - how do you get that bass from just an 8. But again - in order to get it B&W would have to change their pretty looking loudspeakers into dumpy looking loudspeakers. Again that look won't sell. A niche market might buy in to the likes of AN, Harbeth, Volti, Tannoy, Pure Audio Project but if you want to sell in massive numbers you better have GQ inspired stuff like Sonus Faber sleek and B&W curves.
The LOOK (Fashion) comes FIRST. Then they shoehorn sound out of them - they try and get the best sound they can but it is marketed "looks" first with the likes of B&W/Sonus Faber/Totem etc. Lifestyle - like Bose but better and for deeper pockets.
Granted I don't find the AN K/Lx to be ugly - and you can at least order them in over 20 finish options matte or high gloss (and now in all the RAAL colour schemes) The AN K/Lx sounds quite good. I would run it up against what I heard from the Harbeth HL5+ or ATC SCM 19 and top of the line B&W N805 ($6500US) any day. Given the AN K/Lx can be had for around 2,200 US it looks like a pretty good deal to me.
What I have learned over the years is that I want my women slim and sexy, but I want my speakers fat and ugly.