I agree and couldn't have said it better! 👏Those Sovteks aren't too shabby as cheap 2A3s go, but I packed 'em away as "test tubes" years ago after plugging my first pair of genuine RCAs into my build. As an alternative to NOS tubes you might consider plain ol' "OS" tubes. Ditch the "New" for great testing used tubes and save a bundle!
RCAs are very nice but I also liked Sylvanias and GEs and Tung Sols and... well, it's hard not to like a 2A3!
I like the look of your Moondogs! It's been a long time since I looked closely at that design, but the layout is sure pretty.
I really dig those JJ 2a3-40 tubes. The sound as good as the EMLs IMHO. Rugged as well!JJ 2A3-40 is a nice affordable new manufacture tube. EML tubes are more expensive, but I have no experience with them. Then there are a lot of Chinese tubes. Like Redboy, I have several OS tubes that I play most of the time along with the JJ.
Hi Paul, I’ve had my JJ’s running on paramounts for a good bit with no issues. Is your experience recent? I did read that JJ had issues a few years back. @marantzfan has had a set of JJ’s for longer than I have.If you got 15 years out of the EH 2A3s, I would buy another pair!
I have experienced more failures (by number, not percentage) with JJ 2A3-40s than EH/Sovtek 2A3s, and I have used a gazillion EH/Sovtek 2A3s.
I thought it was about the EML mesh plates in the direct coupled amps...Paraglow and early Paramount...with an arcing problem. This led to the “soft start kit”.Around 2015, many owners of Bottlehead amps had problems with the JJ 2A3-40 tubes in their amplifiers with lots of failures and JJ even refused to let the warranty apply to tubes used in Bottlehead amps for a while (you can read about this on Bottlehead forum) this was cleared up eventually if I belive, is it these failures you are referring to when it comes to JJ 2A3-40 tubes?